Since “Steven Jarvis” continues to attack my character, I am forced to respond again:
The author of this blog post fails to understand the context of the image that Jan posted. The man in the photograph is Jason Hatch, a divorced dad who climbed the balcony on Buckingham Palace in 2004. He was a protestor fighting for divorced fathers’ rights to see their children. He was not suicidal, nor did he commit suicide. The author has been told this several times and refuses to acknowledge it because it undermines his entire point that Jan is suggesting that he kill himself. His entire argument relies on this one picture, and as you can see, when the very clever joke is laid out for you, it has nothing at all to do with suicide, nor is there any other sinister intent.
If the author is choosing to see this as suicidal ideation, that is a projection he is placing over the image, as there is nothing inherent about it in the image itself.
This is why I retweeted Jan. He's funny. The idea that I would support people bullying each other with suicide is disgusting. Jan merely took the idea of his original divorced dad trope and layered another joke on top of it. This time he cited the movie Mrs. Doubtfire, a movie about a divorced dad that had nothing at all to do with suicide. I will not insult your intelligence by explaining that part of the joke to you, as anyone who is aware of how Jim Stewartson created a sock to secretly rejoin Twitter can probably figure it out if they’ve seen the movie. If you haven’t, I do give it a recommendation. It is quite good.
For those who don’t know that @HelennEarth was a Jim Stewartson sock, please refer to my tweet on the subject here.
The author continues to say I am being paid to criminally harass him, but the narrative doesn't hold up. It isn't true, nor has it ever been true. He involved me because Jim Stewartson involved me. Jim Stewartson doxed me, including my full legal name, place of employment, current school enrollment, my Facebook, my Tinder profile, my LinkedIn account, and he involved my wife. "Steven Jarvis" is continuing the harassment that started before he had even involved himself.
Since “Steven Jarvis” continues to attack my character, I am forced to respond again:
The author of this blog post fails to understand the context of the image that Jan posted. The man in the photograph is Jason Hatch, a divorced dad who climbed the balcony on Buckingham Palace in 2004. He was a protestor fighting for divorced fathers’ rights to see their children. He was not suicidal, nor did he commit suicide. The author has been told this several times and refuses to acknowledge it because it undermines his entire point that Jan is suggesting that he kill himself. His entire argument relies on this one picture, and as you can see, when the very clever joke is laid out for you, it has nothing at all to do with suicide, nor is there any other sinister intent.
If the author is choosing to see this as suicidal ideation, that is a projection he is placing over the image, as there is nothing inherent about it in the image itself.
That story can be found here.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/sep/13/childrensservices.uknews
This is why I retweeted Jan. He's funny. The idea that I would support people bullying each other with suicide is disgusting. Jan merely took the idea of his original divorced dad trope and layered another joke on top of it. This time he cited the movie Mrs. Doubtfire, a movie about a divorced dad that had nothing at all to do with suicide. I will not insult your intelligence by explaining that part of the joke to you, as anyone who is aware of how Jim Stewartson created a sock to secretly rejoin Twitter can probably figure it out if they’ve seen the movie. If you haven’t, I do give it a recommendation. It is quite good.
For those who don’t know that @HelennEarth was a Jim Stewartson sock, please refer to my tweet on the subject here.
https://twitter.com/VVichelangelo/status/1519720781697241090?s=20&t=BZZN8ctrvHcBU8QSCnhgYg
The author continues to say I am being paid to criminally harass him, but the narrative doesn't hold up. It isn't true, nor has it ever been true. He involved me because Jim Stewartson involved me. Jim Stewartson doxed me, including my full legal name, place of employment, current school enrollment, my Facebook, my Tinder profile, my LinkedIn account, and he involved my wife. "Steven Jarvis" is continuing the harassment that started before he had even involved himself.
OK boomer
Agree 1000% 💜