That’s about the size of it. Well done. It’s just QAnon but substitute Chapo for MAGA3X, both of which go back to Fred/GamerGate anyway. Wonder what Mike was up to in 2014-15? 🤷♂️
Mike was likely Gamer Gating on the Chans considering his personality and mindset.
Most of his 'conspiracy' work in that era based on his older blog was the sort of stuff people make up with their friends at a campfire, none of it spread. I honestly did not see any of the moderately spreading stuff mentioned, and nothing fully fleshed out. When I look at a conspiracy, I want to know when it became relevant, and then track backwards through the many iterations before the one that stuck, as well as to know its purpose and outcomes. Mike doesn't do that.
Julie K. Brown didn’t post on Substack about supposed troll networks and ops, attempting to sell her story using screenshots of tweets. She did real investigative journalism.
That’s right, Jim. Make allusions to secret information you don’t have. We’re still waiting on you to prove that Mike Rothschild has Russian email accounts and ties to Russian operatives.
You’re as ridiculous these days as the @JimboStewartson Twitter account.
So you’re saying Cullen’s documentary and Rothschild’s book were QAnon recruitment tools for left wingers?
That’s nonsense. Neither were even released before January 6th, and Mike Rothschild does not decode Q drops in his book, which you clearly have not read.
You know, Steven, part of providing informed criticism is actually being informed on the particular thing you are criticizing. This is why I watched Fall of Cabal, Out of Shadows, Plandemic, Loose Change, Expelled, and have listened to hundreds, if not thousands, of hours of right wing and religious broadcasting. This is why I have read every post by you and Jim.
The people you’re talking about didn’t start their investigations and research months ago. They have insight based upon a historical perspective that you can’t offer.
You’re never going to be respected or successful in this field. You’ve already ruined that chance. So has Jim.
We still have recruitment efforts to the left ongoing with Flynn out front no longer needing to hide being Q.
Rothschild and Cullen’s work was normalizing and mainstreaming QAnon to the left which now knows more than the right do.
Rothschild was doing this sort of spoon feeding Libs introductory Q stuff for years preceding the insurrection, then downplayed the risk for that day while REAL experts sent out huge warnings about what would happen.
While it is easy to just identify him as a grifter, his gamer gate tactics, protecting the movement and constant lying makes him far worse.
There have been no “real experts” warning about Mike Rothschild for years. He has never posted about QAnon in a way that is favorable to the movement. Neither have the QAnon Anonymous guys. Neither has Jared Holt.
It is pretty clear that you feel slighted by these people, as you did not speak negatively of them before you felt rejected by them on Twitter. The same can be said about Jim.
This is all about your desire for revenge. It’s mostly misdirected hostility. None of it will do anyone any good.
I’m not here to tell anyone what to do. You do your thing, Steven. You’ve already paid a price for your behavior. You’re not hurting anyone besides yourself and the people who believe you.
Cullen's docuseries did a really good job of laying out evidence of who "Q" possibly could have been. I think the main weakness of it is that it was geared more towards people who'd already been tracking the conspiracy theory, and left out people who didn't know much about it. I think it would have been helpful to have had an episode dedicated to what the conspiracy theory is and poking holes in it, but that's just my opinion. Overall, it was really well-done.
I agree, it's important to point out that the people Jim targets were tracking Qanon for years before Jim Kool-Aid man'd his way onto the scene. I started listening to QAA off and on in the beginning because a bunch of coworkers at my job in 2018 were starting to talk about Qanon, and I went searching for answers. By Jim's logic, I should be a True Believer in that bullshit by now. lol. Alas, I am not. The QAA pod helped me talk to at least one coworker and talk him out of the nonsense. Still friends with that guy now, probably because he was able to get out of that mindset. If he'd continued down that path, we would not be on speaking terms right now. The QAA guys, Mike, many other researchers/investigators/journalists are probably why I managed to not get sucked into things like the Wayfair conspiracy theory, or stupid conspiracy theories about covid. I was stressy-depressy-messy in 2020 since there was just *a lot* going on, and I'm glad to have found voices of reason to pay attention to.
I think these guys are just peanut butter and jelly that they've presented their theories, and no one agreed with them. Hell, Steve here obviously doesn't know much about Qanon and it's related conspiracy theories, he just piggy-backs on Jim's notoriety. Munch on those sour grapes, boys!
That’s about the size of it. Well done. It’s just QAnon but substitute Chapo for MAGA3X, both of which go back to Fred/GamerGate anyway. Wonder what Mike was up to in 2014-15? 🤷♂️
Mike was likely Gamer Gating on the Chans considering his personality and mindset.
Most of his 'conspiracy' work in that era based on his older blog was the sort of stuff people make up with their friends at a campfire, none of it spread. I honestly did not see any of the moderately spreading stuff mentioned, and nothing fully fleshed out. When I look at a conspiracy, I want to know when it became relevant, and then track backwards through the many iterations before the one that stuck, as well as to know its purpose and outcomes. Mike doesn't do that.
Did Julie K Brown stop reporting on Jeffery Epstein just because he didn't like her?
Julie K. Brown didn’t post on Substack about supposed troll networks and ops, attempting to sell her story using screenshots of tweets. She did real investigative journalism.
That’s right, Jim. Make allusions to secret information you don’t have. We’re still waiting on you to prove that Mike Rothschild has Russian email accounts and ties to Russian operatives.
You’re as ridiculous these days as the @JimboStewartson Twitter account.
🥺
wowzerz
Said the inventor of pathetic substacking to his even more pathetic copycat.
So you’re saying Cullen’s documentary and Rothschild’s book were QAnon recruitment tools for left wingers?
That’s nonsense. Neither were even released before January 6th, and Mike Rothschild does not decode Q drops in his book, which you clearly have not read.
You know, Steven, part of providing informed criticism is actually being informed on the particular thing you are criticizing. This is why I watched Fall of Cabal, Out of Shadows, Plandemic, Loose Change, Expelled, and have listened to hundreds, if not thousands, of hours of right wing and religious broadcasting. This is why I have read every post by you and Jim.
The people you’re talking about didn’t start their investigations and research months ago. They have insight based upon a historical perspective that you can’t offer.
You’re never going to be respected or successful in this field. You’ve already ruined that chance. So has Jim.
We still have recruitment efforts to the left ongoing with Flynn out front no longer needing to hide being Q.
Rothschild and Cullen’s work was normalizing and mainstreaming QAnon to the left which now knows more than the right do.
Rothschild was doing this sort of spoon feeding Libs introductory Q stuff for years preceding the insurrection, then downplayed the risk for that day while REAL experts sent out huge warnings about what would happen.
While it is easy to just identify him as a grifter, his gamer gate tactics, protecting the movement and constant lying makes him far worse.
There have been no “real experts” warning about Mike Rothschild for years. He has never posted about QAnon in a way that is favorable to the movement. Neither have the QAnon Anonymous guys. Neither has Jared Holt.
It is pretty clear that you feel slighted by these people, as you did not speak negatively of them before you felt rejected by them on Twitter. The same can be said about Jim.
This is all about your desire for revenge. It’s mostly misdirected hostility. None of it will do anyone any good.
I’m not here to tell anyone what to do. You do your thing, Steven. You’ve already paid a price for your behavior. You’re not hurting anyone besides yourself and the people who believe you.
Cullen's docuseries did a really good job of laying out evidence of who "Q" possibly could have been. I think the main weakness of it is that it was geared more towards people who'd already been tracking the conspiracy theory, and left out people who didn't know much about it. I think it would have been helpful to have had an episode dedicated to what the conspiracy theory is and poking holes in it, but that's just my opinion. Overall, it was really well-done.
I agree, it's important to point out that the people Jim targets were tracking Qanon for years before Jim Kool-Aid man'd his way onto the scene. I started listening to QAA off and on in the beginning because a bunch of coworkers at my job in 2018 were starting to talk about Qanon, and I went searching for answers. By Jim's logic, I should be a True Believer in that bullshit by now. lol. Alas, I am not. The QAA pod helped me talk to at least one coworker and talk him out of the nonsense. Still friends with that guy now, probably because he was able to get out of that mindset. If he'd continued down that path, we would not be on speaking terms right now. The QAA guys, Mike, many other researchers/investigators/journalists are probably why I managed to not get sucked into things like the Wayfair conspiracy theory, or stupid conspiracy theories about covid. I was stressy-depressy-messy in 2020 since there was just *a lot* going on, and I'm glad to have found voices of reason to pay attention to.
I think these guys are just peanut butter and jelly that they've presented their theories, and no one agreed with them. Hell, Steve here obviously doesn't know much about Qanon and it's related conspiracy theories, he just piggy-backs on Jim's notoriety. Munch on those sour grapes, boys!
i ain’t reading all that
i’m happy for u tho
or sorry that happened