Trolls attack anyone. SPH generally attack just those connected to their single purpose. For example, they would ignore random comments when assigned to follow a target, save when those are positive towards their target. At that point they will attack often with multiple accounts, to wedge support away from their target.
Both are inauthentic. Some of the SPH operations are illegal while some are not, depending on what they do. Donovan and Chenelle interfered in people's right to vote using threats and intimidation, which is a Federal crime. Same with many individuals in their group who operated in coordinated effort to support the attacks. At the same time Mensch and Diresta were on the opposing "team" but didn't to my knowledge illegally interfere with anyone's civil rights.
Twitter Accounts that are created and used to spread HATEFUL CONDUCT. 🙂 Mr. Jarvis can explain it better, but the accounts are intended to harm -cause emotional and mental distress. It is vile. And the people who operate these accounts, on behalf of whoever wants to pay them to do such, have absolutely no issue in doing so. So one has to wonder what the fuck their problem is. Sometimes they do it on their own to people they don’t like or who they choose to ridicule... “just because”. The Operation Mr. Jarvis’ Substack documents are criminals. If you watch the comments to this answer/ or to ANY of Steven’s posts, you will witness an extremely lame response by the actual people behind these Single Purpose Hate Accounts. The only PURPOSE of the account is to cause the Target pain.
Going to work doing something legal where one doesn't have to worry about the authorities showing up would make it less needed to ask such questions. That isn't what Matt, Mike, Maccabee, etc. do, do they?
Single Purpose Hate accounts, using to coordinate illegal criminal harassment, are NOT normal.
MM is correct.
They focus entirely on one purpose or operation, speaking as much trauma as possible, weaponizing information, lying, exploiting weaknesses.
Trolls attack anyone. SPH generally attack just those connected to their single purpose. For example, they would ignore random comments when assigned to follow a target, save when those are positive towards their target. At that point they will attack often with multiple accounts, to wedge support away from their target.
Both are inauthentic. Some of the SPH operations are illegal while some are not, depending on what they do. Donovan and Chenelle interfered in people's right to vote using threats and intimidation, which is a Federal crime. Same with many individuals in their group who operated in coordinated effort to support the attacks. At the same time Mensch and Diresta were on the opposing "team" but didn't to my knowledge illegally interfere with anyone's civil rights.
Twitter Accounts that are created and used to spread HATEFUL CONDUCT. 🙂 Mr. Jarvis can explain it better, but the accounts are intended to harm -cause emotional and mental distress. It is vile. And the people who operate these accounts, on behalf of whoever wants to pay them to do such, have absolutely no issue in doing so. So one has to wonder what the fuck their problem is. Sometimes they do it on their own to people they don’t like or who they choose to ridicule... “just because”. The Operation Mr. Jarvis’ Substack documents are criminals. If you watch the comments to this answer/ or to ANY of Steven’s posts, you will witness an extremely lame response by the actual people behind these Single Purpose Hate Accounts. The only PURPOSE of the account is to cause the Target pain.
You are Welcome.
Seinfeld character account,
Going to work doing something legal where one doesn't have to worry about the authorities showing up would make it less needed to ask such questions. That isn't what Matt, Mike, Maccabee, etc. do, do they?
This is straight out of Gamergate. And an abuse of loopholes in our laws. Of course only a psychopath would take advantage of this.
"Gamergate should have taught businesses that online mobs can and do look for excuses to be outraged, as a pretext to harass and abuse their targets."
https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/1/20/20808875/gamergate-lessons-cultural-impact-changes-harassment-laws
It says a lot when you leave out allegedly spamming DFW school districts would meet the criteria for online harassment.