Reread the story. Susan working to recruit people into a planned fifth column activity back in 2017 is a big deal even if it wasn't the Russians who had the most interest in her activity.
Why do you have to resort to accusations about my identity and intentions? I have absolutely no connections to anyone on the internet. None. Zero.
I have been observing QAnon, conspiracy theories and the right wing for many years now. I came across Jim Stewartson, and later you, and I am unimpressed.
The fact that you can’t even leave comments up says a lot about your credibility and intentions. So does the fact that anyone who has ever criticized or disagreed with you becomes some nefarious actor in one of your stories.
Additionally, if you are "unimpressed" go and read something that impresses you instead. You are not acting remotely like a genuine human being when you do this, Brad or whomever.
Your anonymous comments intentionally misrepresented what I wrote, and therefore was removed. If you had not thrown in the last sentence accusing me of something I did not do, cite Fox or Infowars, I would have allowed it to remain.
I was not accusing you of getting your information from Fox News or InfoWars. This is a misunderstanding, and may be because of my lack of clarity.
The Q poster used existing rumors of an Antifa apocalypse, started not long before the first Q drop, to lend credibility to their claim that the arrest of John Podesta would lead to the arrests of Hillary Clinton and other supposed co-conspirators. Q claimed there would be unrest. This day was chosen for a reason. That reason was rumors about this protest event that never amounted to much.
If you do some looking into this time period, you’re going to find that what I say checks out.
As far as me “not acting anything like a real person”, I feel like I’m being pretty cordial with you here.
I’m not speaking for anyone. I’m saying you’re conflating two unconnected things.
The Russians play both sides which was also widely documented by the Mueller Report and SSCI. Are you saying a tactic dating back to the Soviet era was never deployed in 2016?
"Observing" you say? So possessing no qualifications related to the study of asymmetric and information warfare-while accusing Stewartson of doing the exact same thing?
To Susan's comrade posting misinformation,
Reread the story. Susan working to recruit people into a planned fifth column activity back in 2017 is a big deal even if it wasn't the Russians who had the most interest in her activity.
Why do you have to resort to accusations about my identity and intentions? I have absolutely no connections to anyone on the internet. None. Zero.
I have been observing QAnon, conspiracy theories and the right wing for many years now. I came across Jim Stewartson, and later you, and I am unimpressed.
The fact that you can’t even leave comments up says a lot about your credibility and intentions. So does the fact that anyone who has ever criticized or disagreed with you becomes some nefarious actor in one of your stories.
Additionally, if you are "unimpressed" go and read something that impresses you instead. You are not acting remotely like a genuine human being when you do this, Brad or whomever.
Your anonymous comments intentionally misrepresented what I wrote, and therefore was removed. If you had not thrown in the last sentence accusing me of something I did not do, cite Fox or Infowars, I would have allowed it to remain.
I was not accusing you of getting your information from Fox News or InfoWars. This is a misunderstanding, and may be because of my lack of clarity.
The Q poster used existing rumors of an Antifa apocalypse, started not long before the first Q drop, to lend credibility to their claim that the arrest of John Podesta would lead to the arrests of Hillary Clinton and other supposed co-conspirators. Q claimed there would be unrest. This day was chosen for a reason. That reason was rumors about this protest event that never amounted to much.
If you do some looking into this time period, you’re going to find that what I say checks out.
As far as me “not acting anything like a real person”, I feel like I’m being pretty cordial with you here.
I’m not speaking for anyone. I’m saying you’re conflating two unconnected things.
Maybe start like this first next time, instead of all the "I am unimpressed" bullshit. You may get a better response.
The Russians play both sides which was also widely documented by the Mueller Report and SSCI. Are you saying a tactic dating back to the Soviet era was never deployed in 2016?
🔥
Well you certainly seem credible 🤣
Ok, “Troll Hunter”.
Ok "observer"
I'm just an observer. I'm just an innocent observer. Lol
"Observing" you say? So possessing no qualifications related to the study of asymmetric and information warfare-while accusing Stewartson of doing the exact same thing?
*Irony enters the room*