Travis Brown Claims He Doesn’t Know “random” Rocco Castoro & Dunking on Remi's ThisPersonDoesNotExist Falsehood
A Series on Misinformation, Disinformation and Subterfuge
With the Daily Beast article out many of the networks and individuals that have been misleading the public went on the record, some of them clearly better than others. Travis Brown was one who clearly did not.
Travis created a tool that accessed private user data that presumably only can be accessed via console code. I claimed Rocco Castoro told him to break the tool.
As can be seen in the screenshot in the bottom right corner, is Rocco Castoro. He and Travis were responsible for doxing Chaya Raichik, the toxic and dangerous Libs of Tik Tok account that came out far stronger and more influential as the far right base circled the wagons.
Rocco who clearly knows Travis, given the co-credit they took above, is quite random. He does however know and work with Travis, so the whole thing above is a lie.
Here is how the tool helped link one of Susan Portnoy’s accounts she lied about.
Rocco, Susan and everybody else that was using the same operational tactic of account rotation, designed to obstruct investigation of their account activity, were none too happy that Travis’s tool pulled up private data. The thing about the Memory.lol tool is that the code itself would indicate whether or not it was built using the same ‘partial’ source code dumped on GitHub that the ops highlighted here via Fionda retweet and used to commit an endless run of felonies.
Let’s look at another falsehood that came up after the Daily Beast article, the one Remi Barrette and Mike Rothschild claim that Michelangelo Maccabee randomly generated a Filipino child that looked exactly like my own, had her grayness in her eyes, the highlights, and the hair gap when her sister found a pair of scissors.
Remi Barrette features this site when running his schtick claiming to be a disinformation researcher when all he has done is created the disinformation. Like all these AI’s, one can seed an image and get a distorted but near copy based on the text and settings given. You can look here if you are curious and want to try it yourself.
Most AI’s have text based filter controls to prevent rendering things like nudity, yet they all, even when using a text based script, are stealing somebody else’s work to assemble the images that may have extra or missing appendages.
Here is one image I created about two weeks ago experimenting on a different AI.
You’ll note an artist signature was sourced into the picture as well as this image certainly not being a puppy. Here was a second attempt with the same script.
There is nil chance of an AI randomly generating a child of such specific racial, age and intricately similar features without first putting in a seed image that guides the algorithms to build one. None.
I have tried a host of keywords to see what the AI would pull together. Outfits, textures, colors, ages, features, they simply do not churn out that level of specificity needed for the criminal cabal to make this lie even halfway believable especially when I kept copious amounts of receipts.
The Daily Beast regretfully removed the key part, naming the criminal conspirator0 account from the piece protecting Remi Barrette from press scrutiny that he won’t eventually be able to avoid.