Trauma, Absurdities and Leah McElrath Doesn't Read What She Retweets
A Series On Misinformation, Disinformation and Subterfuge
Sometimes the Ops are simply ridiculous in their efforts to cause trauma.
Someone stumbles onto my Substack organically, begins to read, is deeply moved by what they have seen while happening to register a silly name as coded language?
OctoSue’s Buttcrack Jesus. We ALL know she still has that on her laptop background.
The point of Mike Flynn’s Q resurrection on the very day women are shackled, was to cause maximum Trauma. Q pushers all over Twitter ensured that happened.
Reminds of those moments one turns on the lights and all the cockroaches scurry away and hide chittering nonsense. I had a bug in the blog code that kept a banned pest able to spam. Turned off posts then turned posts back on a couple minutes later. The trolls were panicking unsure of what to do without their favorite author.
Yep, these perverted punks criminally coordinating as shown above, have been falsely accusing me of sex-trafficking a minor. OneSecondName who weaponizes grief was mentioning her likely use shown below, to which Gal Suburban was not reacting to. Criminals like Matt, Maccabee, “Julie,” Susan and others do this stuff constantly, and then for some reason go out and publish that they were responsible.
When an Op suggested Leah McElrath was a clown, I had to take a peek as this account is amplified and interacts with so many Single Purpose Hate Accounts I always wondered what is up with her.
I wasn’t expecting this.
As a warning, this is the most bonkers thing I have seen written by any account that was intending themselves to actually be taken seriously from a professional point of view, here choosing to do so of her own free will, to defend the Anarchy ideology.
Leah told two BIG lies here I have to address.
Badd, was initially hoodwinked by Louise Mensch as she conned many well meaning people on the left. He figured her out quicker than most and has consistently called her out now for years. Leah, who knows Mensch still chose to falsely claim Badd Compani as a Menschite. This fact implies Leah McElrath, is lying by omission, pushing the nonsense Blue Anon Conspiracy Mensch herself popularized ostracizing others just as she claims Mensch did to herself.
The second lie is how she justifies the anarchist ideology being okay because some anarchists are nice or do good things.
Really.
Is Louise Mensch, the most prominent anarcho-capatalist, a good person simply because her anarchy helps the fascists gain more power? No. The only difference between an anarcho-capalist like Mensch, Nicole, Matt and a regular anarchist, is that one gets paid to destroy and the other does so for free. Neither are morally good. She does give some good advice here, that she hasn’t taken herself.
Nicole, whom this tweet was directed, expresses glee to every alarming development seeing each crisis as a game to profit off of. None of her advocacy, destruction, nor terrorizing people comes free. Someone signs the check.
Leah either doesn’t see this, or is clearly in on the grift.
Anarchy, the ideology of murder, burning, looting, destruction, rape, and lawlessness is never justifiable under any circumstances. It is simply destruction for the sake of destroying things. Anarchy like its polar opposite of Fascism are detrimental to a functional society and basic human rights, with neither extremist ideology having any redeeming societal value.
Another point of the article and Badd’s Tweet was that BLM and Antifa are non-violent movements, clearly not Anarchists, a point which both Karmaonesixone and Leah McElrath absurdly dispute. Why?
Let’s use pop culture as a reference.
These fictional movies, based on a society having one day during a year given where no government, rules, law prohibited anything, the anarchist ideal, are not the kind of moralistic future anyone realistically wants. Can Leah advocate for this sort of society?
This though, is the best part of the thread, the TOTALLY inauthentic Nicole introduction despite the two having a long, long association with one another, and Leah saying the quiet part out loud, lacking a filter.
Okay. That DOES sound bad.
After seeing a tweet of an article on her timeline, which she didn’t even bother to read, Leah retweeted adding a lengthy thread refuting everything. That’s about as fact free as one can get while going about spreading disinformation.
Crazy. This next part is even more clownish.
The inauthentic Single Purpose Hate Account Winkie_Doo she amplified is a repurposed fascist MAGA account. Nicole and Matt got a lot of these empty older accounts awhile back, then used them to fool people during their attacks and Intelligence operations, just like Mensch’s groups do.
One reason I haven’t highlighted Leah before now is that she, despite associating with so many dangerous people, is that her own activities aren’t deemed as malicious or malevolent as Nicole or Matt who still try to kill, destroy and psychologically harm.
She appears to have crossed that line with this tweet.
Badd doesn’t hide his identity like Matt does on dozens of former and present accounts. Why? Because he is authentic, doing good work that interferes with the people trying to loot, burn, beat and destroy.
Last receipt on this one.
Giving praise to a guy like Rocco happens only for two reasons. One, the person doesn’t know or follow Rocco. Two, the person works within Rocco’s Op.
It’s people like you that stop others who climbed out of dangerous propaganda from righting their wrongs. Show proof of anyone being paid to tweet, or stfu.
Hi, Dee again.
I just want to clarify something for you. I've mentioned it on Twitter and know you monitor the account, but you may have missed it.
I'm the one who initially spotted the MtG 'buttcrack' guy and retweeted it.
It had nothing whatsoever to do with you, though. I went to all manner of cons (sci-fi, fantasy, gaming, etc.) from the early 80s through the 90s, with a few since. The time I spent attending, it was very much a 'boys club' for a variety of reasons that made the events somewhat (if not aggressively) unwelcoming to women (and a variety of other marginalized folks).
The dude in question isn't fetishizing people for pornographic reasons, he was highlighting one of the elements of that uncomfortable environment at that time. (In this case, not taking care of one's hygiene and wardrobe and thus exposing people to... well, you were around, so I'm pretty sure you know what I'm talking about. Oof! I hear things have improved a fair bit since those times, and it's welcome news.)
Someone else retweeted it and linked it up with you, but it wasn't KassandraSeven.
Just setting the record straight on this one.