Sue Talks, With Socks

A Series on Misinformation, Disinformation and Subterfuge

It’s okay to talk to yourself. Heck, I do that out loud sometimes to think through a particular problem or writing a script, just generally not doing so in public because it’s frankly weird. Not so for paid trolls. They talk to themselves ALL the time, for impressions. Being fake, especially on socks, is part of what they get paid for. As Matt’s got all of his socks on lockdown, sensing likely that he is in very big trouble, we will instead turn to one of his competitors and sometimes ally, to see how one talks with their own socks, and to what purpose.

Subbing self and socks speaking-roles schizophrenically, Susan, Sue and Susie slanderously snipe Stewartson sardonically, sadistically and sarcastically.

The point of these inauthentic conversations is to give off an appearance of authenticity that Susan and each of her socks are distinctively different people. All three accounts shown above, have the same speech patterns, interests, behaviors, social interactions, connections that it doesn’t take merging two images giving mismatching earrings to give a tell all three are Sue.

It only took me about an hour looking at Oct and K7 accounts back in February to see that they were the same while Susan used her own name Su—-s-an with the other weird “AF” and creepy sock puppet she made.

These two certainly aren’t the only socks in Susan’s drawers. Just like all the accounts so far revealed to be Matt’s, I would expect she has more than a dozen, many parked, a few seemingly abandoned, some locked, others active and engaged in self-conversation.

Having self-discussions with one’s socks generates impressions while also being highly intentionally discoverable to other low-count followers. Over time an operator can pull real people into these inauthentic exchanges, with many found threads consisting of forty or more accounts spending months on the task of constant bickering and infighting.

Those types of threads are inauthentic means of pulling people away from mainstream Twitter and radicalizing them.

Mensch and other PsyOp brigadiers, unsurprisingly, show up heavily in many such threads, mostly via deleted by author placeholders, spanning not just months, but years including the ones involving Robert McNeese. Avoid joining those types of threads. After the Ops that pulled people in leave to work on other tasks, all that is eventually left in those threads are bots and the angriest of real people to keep the chaos going perpetually.

Another reason Ops began talking to themselves using socks is that this mimicked what was successfully outlined as working as evidenced by multiple federal indictments handed out so far cracking down on foreign election interference using botnets.

Now have I got everybody’s attention?

Those botnets have largely been replaced with contract workers better suited to mimic actual people. The bots are still there. What those are designed to do now is specifically amplify with a like and a rotating list of short responses. Using people instead of bots doesn’t suddenly make what they are doing legal. Let me put it this way. Doesn’t matter if it is a PAC, a candidate, a very wealthy school board member, or a US political party that provides funding. It is still illegal to take action as an unregistered agent working to undermine an election or defraud the Federal government. Get it?

When Matt, Nicole and other spies began a contract to target, dox and harass parents and a reporter over the San Francisco School Board Recall election, those key operators ran afoul of the same crime that the Mackay indictment was issued for-election interference.

While I think some of the other Ops are laughing right now, as it’s a professional win when one of their less-liked competitors gets themselves fully exposed, I will add some things that may sullen the mood.

If the Feds rightly charge those who participated on Matt and Nicole’s team under a conspiracy charge over the SFSB op, which along with obstruction appears likely given social media deletions, and those co-conspirators turn over evidence of other crimes to reduce a lofty sentence, like say who was all involved in the silencing Jim Stewartson contract that included the who is who of social media Intelligence operators, that becomes oh so not fun for the likes of Sue, Louise, Chad, Erin, Mike and others that become implicated later in other crimes. Keep in mind this. Unlike past Social Media Intelligence operations, generally conducted by Russian, Chinese or Iranian remotely via bot networks, the private contractors I have been looking at are sloppy, fight amongst themselves and then brag. They all likely will talk.

So who will end up flipping first?

And now, back to Sue and her Socks, with one more promised big bomb of a reveal remaining.

Sue via her socks likes her own work, adding impressions, manipulating Twitter in the process. If an operator of a single purpose, multi-account hate network like Susan, Chad, Louise or Matt runs has enough socks and impression bots, they can individually generate high thresholds of impressions promoting their work and attacks quickly. When they team up, it is even faster. That is how these PsyOps sock accounts and bots work. Impression building. Coordinate attacks. Lock and delete. Park or repeat.

And yes, you can buy bots just like the spies in this thriller do. Don’t.

As for the second juicy reveal.

PsyOps also must control the informational battle zone, keeping threats to their operations from exposing them. That is where big guys like the Canadian conspirator0 that is definitely not a Susan sock as Lance thought, but has taught Susan everything she knows about bots, comes in handy.

Conspirator0 too is an Op, perhaps running his own drawer of socks. He is credited for being responsible for my inauthentic ban by the guy designated with the second handle listed above.

Just like Stewartson and Rebekah Jones.

Why do I suspect this account has administrative access and used it corruptly?

Normally these networks harass people into a reaction and then mass report it. That didn’t work with any of the three of us, so someone manually did something to bypass Twitter Safety protocols. All three suspensions were of the same type, for spamming and manipulation. That is what is assigned to bots, not people.

If a person generates too many of a particular action on twitter that appears to be bot like, the account is placed under a restriction, not banned. Examples of this are follow backs, likes, retweets. Do too many within a given time period, and the system reacts with a warning. As that didn’t happen it was clear someone who was given the ability to offline bots, as an expert on bot activity, by Twitter Safety, broke rules to ban contracted targets.

That fits conspirator0’s profile.

Look again at the screenshot.

Conspirator0 is conversing with both Nicole and Matt, two exposed intelligence operatives responsible for manipulating an election, infiltrating and destroying the Thinkin Project, and wracked up multiple cases across the US involving criminal harassment campaigns. Not a good look. The other guy, TylerM, is operating a self-designated single purpose hate account dedicated to defaming Stewartson. Why align oneself with bad guys if one isn’t themselves a bad guy?

For shame conspirator0.

One more thing about the above screenshot. Conspirator0, after having likely used his insider access to ban Stewartson, was presently involved in a thread crafting the false cover story that Jim not conspirator0, violated access. That is obstruction.

Yoel Roth and Twitter need to do the right thing. Ban single purpose multi-accounts hate networks like the KassandraSeven Network. Reauthorize the human accounts conspirator0 suppressed including mine, Stewartson and Jones.