Single purpose hate accounts networked across Twitter will have a harder time operating if Elon Musk’s authenticate every human initiative goes through and destroys all the socks and bots they deploy for effective campaigns. Let’s look at the central SPHA, TylerM, within the branching networks starting with a Chirpty. Most of these graphics will show allies, counter trolls and targets. I see only two good accounts and a handful of unknowns.
Most Chirpty that I have captured regarding members or accounts included a fair mix of good, bad and unknown accounts within their circle. This one is almost all primary operatives and socks, with two recognizable counter trolls on the chart. I see only two counter trolls and just a couple accounts I do not recognize as being complicit in the coordinated harassment campaigns because this is clearly the most focused employee, designating his purpose on his profile as Jim Stewartson and other things.
I respect that.
This account doesn’t generally go out and get its digital hands dirty, acting as a primary source others in the network generally amplify. Most of the operatives come to his threads, hence their appearance in the chart. Occasionally the account has a discussion, some I find enlightening. Most conversations though are throwing out ridiculous conspiracies, hate, lies or other line of attacks to use on influence campaigns. Back to the chart.
In the first tier we have three perhaps four accounts piloted by Susan along with Jan Bobrowicz, Mike Rothschild, Louise Mensch (DearMrPutin at upper right) and Michelangelo Maccabbee. With Louise Mensch’s primary account in the third ring, this is the best physical representation that demonstrates connectivity and possible coordination between the entire Mensch-K7 network.
Looking at the second tier, one good guy account, Blueyanon shows up, with all the rest being accounts held by the network. Four main operatives show up in this band with Karma, OSN, Philippine fugitive and pro-eugenics 8Chan creator Fredrick Brennan and Nicole Chenelle. The outer ban of mostly socks has Mensch and likely Twitter Safety infiltrator conspirator0. With mostly socks at that third tier, gotta expect at least one account belongs to Matt Donovan. There is also one good account, PeterBackes3 and a couple I am only vaguely familiar with as I blocked a ton of these accounts prior to my third engagement with Susan.
Blocking the smaller accounts from being used to coordinate a mass reporting attack, was key to my account surviving as long as it did despite my never breaking any Twitter rule. I also intentionally blocked many larger ones like Brennan while most of the bot networks were running pro-Russia campaigns, rendering their services unusable.
My last Chirpty discussion on ouroboredom got this reply from prominent anarchist, that infiltrates, blows things up and has my respect for not bothering to hide herself while even tweeting out her own food delivery maps on Twitter.
Which reminded me of her compatriot Karma saying this a month back.
I get the threats. You’re all exposed with one group launching Yonder bombs at the other posting and sending stuff constantly pushing you all more fully out into the open, while recruitment pitches seemingly go back and forth.
Do you stay with team Treason or do you counterattack and expose the other operation as they are doing effectively to yours?
Or are you going to continue playing a blocking game moving pieces around, hoping the pawns aren’t all sacrificed to protect the queens.
Someone I know on Twitter alerted me to this post, and I have a few thoughts.
The idea that the author would accuse me of being a member of a group being paid to bully him into suicide is disgusting. I lost my father to suicide 15 years ago and battle with depression myself. From reading the other posts on this blog, it would seem that he does not have much regard for the feelings of anyone else and doesn't care what his baseless accusations might do to the people he is making them against.
Here's a little about me for the individuals who might read this comment. As I write this I am studying Civil Rights law to become an attorney after having watched several of my neighborhoods explode in the wake of the murder of George Floyd. I lived in Uptown Minneapolis while I was courting the woman who would become my wife. I saw waves of protesters flood past my old 4th story walk up on Capital Hill, where my wife and I lived while she was getting her MS in Conflict Resolution from the Jimmy Carter School for Peace Studies at George Mason University. I saw violent clashes happen in Portland, the city where my son was born.
And through all of this I thought, what can I do? How can I help?
So I quit my job as a phlebotomist (a job that I took to help people after I having donated blood plasma twice a week for 20+ years and seeing the need for people with steady hands), and I decided to go back to school to study law. I had plenty of time to do it too, since COVID had shut down all of my volunteer work including hours a week spent at the food shelf, helping with my son's local school district, and visiting the children's hospital, where I would dress as a wizard (and occasionally a superhero) and do magic shows for kids with debilitating illnesses.
What did the author of this blog do? Created a Twitter account and a Medium account and used them to attack people like me. Fortunately, Twitter and Medium both decided that he wasn't right for their platforms and removed his content and his ability to publish more. With his options limited, he came here to Substack, a platform with much looser content standards, a platform that gleefully promotes the most vile of misinformation like anti-vax sentiments and election fraud conspiracies.
My point is to just take the information that "Steven Jarvis" provides with a grain of salt. There is a reason multiple platforms have decided his content is too egregious to be shared by them, and a reason he does so from this specific one. He wants to control a narrative. He wants to paint people as monsters for disagreeing with him, for pointing out that he is wrong, and for defending themselves against his accusations.
That can be something you support or something you speak out against, and I know which side I'm on. If anyone would like to speak to me or ask me questions about the content of this comment, my twitter handle is in the body of his article. I have nothing to say to the author, because I find him as contemptable as Twitter and Medium do.
The real question here of course is whether Renee knew Jeff Giesea was larping as the Nazi Bunker W Smith when she had him on the NewKnowledge/Yonder podcast. Not my fault she didn’t do the due dilegence!