Rothschild's Response

A Series on Misinformation, Disinformation and Subterfuge

After my piece calling out Mike it is fair to publish his lie-filled response.

Mike lies. Let’s break it down. Is Mike an Op?

Mike is a dangerous Op that spreads virulent disinformation that put our entire Democracy at risk regarding the purpose and direction of Mike Flynn’s Q Anon. Q Anon’s central purpose was realized when Mike Flynn’s aligned fifth column forces of Q Anon, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers and others sacked our Nation’s Capitol on January 6th.

Does he have a handler?

Probably. Some Ops do this garbage for other reasons, like grifting, shilling a book of nonsense or getting paid to destroy things. It is possible Mike does this for those selfish reasons without a handler.

Is Mike paid to tweet?

That is entirely possible. One item I haven’t previously shared was the legal filing from an LLC Yonder allegedly uses to pay private contractors, likely gained via public records requests. The gist of the lawsuit was that the Op claimed to have received half the promised compensation, meaning a salary of $76,800 for 15-20 hours weekly work. The LLC argued these were the agreed upon payment terms of the $38,400 yearly contract they fulfilled for up to nine months.

Yes, social media influence campaigning is a lucrative career, not just for Nigerian princes, but Octopus’s, Fish, former Condé Nast PR VPs and Wizards that spend 24/7 online targeting and bullying people.

Does Mike have Sock accounts?

Mike has sock accounts that likely include the Elva T Foust and Dennis Mitchell accounts as evidenced by his interacting with each account without being tagged to join into the inauthentic conversation. Besides, in the next tweet shown further below he surprisingly admits to having at least one, which he refers to as an alt allowing him to spy on right-wing accounts when no account is necessary to do that. Mike knows that you don’t need an account to keep tabs on people, simply a web browser.

Is Mike uninteresting?

From the moment he began suicide trolling from behind a block I found him dangerously interesting, despite not having a clue who he was or what he was doing at the time. I was genuine when I first posted that he had blocked me, asking the question what is it I should know about this guy? I found out quickly how dishonest and misleading of a disinformation mule he was.

I purposely ignored reading Jim Stewartson’s work for the entirety of the time I was on Twitter looking into the bullies targeting Heidi Cuda. I did so to form my own opinions of those Ops who might come out and reveal their ugly selves. At one point I had ALL the main Ops I hadn’t pre-blocked attacking me in a frenzy thinking that that would get the same reaction other victims gave, and they could mass report to suspend me. That included trolls Chad Loder, Erin Gallagher, Jared Holt, Susan, Remi Barrette and pretty much all the malignant abusers that also had coordinated the same abuse while Yoel Roth tagged in along with Twitter Safety ignored their attacks as likely contractually agreed upon against Jim Stewartson.

Mike though is one of the more undisciplined of the PsyOp bunch, while Brad who ran the TylerM account, clearly the most disciplined and intelligent.

Again, Mike lies. Those two accounts and Substacks that targeted my kids are either operated by Mike or he knows the operator personally. Again, a huge account like his would not see an original tweet from heavily ratio-ed abusive accounts like Elva or Dennis on their feed. His lack of candor and planning makes it clear what he is doing, and that is habitual lying as a point of emphasis.

Mike is free to associate with those who hosted child pornography for almost four years if he wants to. Sure. He is free to befriend someone who tried to have women in gaming killed via SWATTING. Sure. Rothschild is free to white knight a much older woman destroying the Me-Too movement on behalf of a Social Media Influence operation. Sure. Mike is free to associate with groups that undermine our nation democracy and spread conspiracies and disinformation. Sure. He is also free to associate with roughly one-hundred anonymous single purpose hate networked accounts including Jan Bobrowicz that enjoys repeating the same Twitter approved and endorsed suicide suggestive attacks over and over and over that it gets boring looking at his account to see if he learned something new or not. Sure.

That doesn’t mean that the taint of those associations don’t rub off on Mike’s own sketchy reputation as Q Anon’s premier gatekeeper protecting the Op.

Here is the final Mike response.

If you burn down a building, a Twitter account or a business Mike, that doesn’t make your victim bad. It simply means YOU are bad.