Editor’s Note:
I am working to post older pieces from Medium onto Substack and generally will not be sending them by email.
There was ZERO REASON for Susan to have the below picture of a dog and newspapers published while she was out of the country. While Stewartson believes the picture was authentic, just that she had friends who were taking care of the dogs took it and sent it to her, I believe she merged two photos and had the dogs in New York most of the time.
Both of us agree that KassandraSeven is Susan, a New Yorker leading a double life as a professional troll while role playing occasionally as a travel blogger with almost no discernible income. How did we know Sue is Sue? She did stupid things reconstituting some of her real world work with her inauthentic stuff.
Before you read the article, Jan Bobrowicz’s green lines analysis demonstrate clearly how bad the general direction of the shadows of the paper and dog was off compared to the deck railings.
Below was Originally Published March 8, 2022
First, math.
Most people who know me know I love teaching mathematics, something I had to put on hold to pursue more lucrative opportunities. Math is concrete and stable. Same with the Sun.
In the following image purported to be “proof” that Kassandra Seven isn’t really the fifty year old Sue as Jim Stewartson has allegedly unmasked, the Sun casts shadows on the porch railing, and the house at a roughly 42 degree angle. Because the Sun is the constant light source for all the shadows cast, each measured shadow should have the same slope, or angle.
The added dog and papers have a roughly 12 degree angle, obviously caused by a different Sun for THAT to be true (which doesn’t actually fool anyone that isn’t emotionally invested in the abuse or in on the con). One can see the dog shadow isn’t the same as the railings.
Editor’s note: Neither is the shadow cast from the paper. It was never about the dog, rather Susan’s deception.
The deck itself is not using a standard six-inches wide plank that better more expensive decks are now made with. Note above the dog’s head is a square metal leg of a chair. Four of those, which are likely are less than one-square-inch in area, would be needed to measure the width, so these planks are three to four inches wide, not six. If one really wanted to do so, they could also measure the width of a standard nail hole on a board, or even the discarded kids drink Koolaid Burst toppers sitting just left of the added dog and use that instead as reference. Those are under an inch, so the boards are likely just 2x4s.
A newspaper is twelve inches wide, so K7’s Doggie papers were improperly registered, scaled to eight inches, making the pup clownishly gigantic looking and funny. Kassandra isn’t fooling anybody, save maybe her subs that likely drank the Koolaid and left the tops out on that porch.
Let’s get back on track, shall we?
Kassandra Seven, as Jim Stewartson noted, is a weaponized troll who targets prominent researchers, and independent media that work in the exposing disinformation field. While I did get her attention, based on a hypothesis that all that would require is dropping the right keyword, I needed her to actually look at my account and see my pinned tweet that was set to my Weaponizing Social Media article to cause her to choose me as her next target. She of course did.
Before I get to what happened after my post, recall I mentioned Kassandra’s org is attacking prominent individuals working to expose disinformation? It is probably no coincidence that this thread regarding Zev Shalev would be the thread she jumps in on. Narativ Live is one of several podcast shows that certain people DO NOT want circulating. It is also one podcast that both Heidi Cuda and Jim Stewartson have made appearances on. I have not, as yet. Zev is also a mutual follow of mine from early on when I published my book on both LinkedIn and Twitter.
I list those things for clarity sake, not to boost my reputation as it is unlikely Zev knew who I was before I reached out to him for this story. While it is unknown whether or not her troll farm is tracking Zev like they are doing to Stewartson, Cuda and now me, I would strongly suspect these bad actors are keeping a database and are networking frequently and do have aligned, if not separately organized goals of whom they are to target.
This is also the one thread where Mr. Shalev had just been hit with a bait and switch, ruin the reputation PsyOp. Here is the smear:
It’s apparent this anti-reputational hit job stuff has happened before with…
I recall there being a two or three tweet thread from the initial conversation I felt was contextually critical to understanding what was going on at the time but could not find the tweets after searching through both Zev’s and Kimberly’s Twitter feed.
The gist of what was said, was similar to the tweet I embedded above, with someone, accusing Zev of platforming a Holocaust denier, and that was why the separation. Zev then replied, explaining that it was they who recommended that he have this individual on.
Following that recommend allowed the recommender, whoever that was, to then diminish Zev’s reputation, the point of the PsyOp.
Back to Kassandra.
Zev has also had both Heidi Cuda and Jim Stewartson on his show. I haven’t, and since he and I have been long mutual follows on both LinkedIn and Twitter, I am more than happy to fill in a slot on his podcast.
The strange thing is I instead was the target of the “cause reputation harm” attack. This meant, unbeknownst to Kassandra I had gained what I had sought when I first hooked her saying Jim Stewartson’s name, indirect ability to direct her behavior towards things she and I both mutually wanted.
I honestly did not expect to reel her in this easy. I also didn’t expect that non-following accounts would jump in to defend me, but hey, that goes to show intelligent, kind and informed people follow Zev Shalev.
I additionally tweeted a bunch at K7 beyond this during the thread, to give an impression that I was upset or panicked that she was now targeting my reputation. None of them really are important. All that I cared about was setting an impression of defending myself and me being powerless against her reputation smear. Bullies love that.
I also have to laugh at Kass’s attempt to disconnect a conversation with someone she knows isn’t going to budge, with a nice, have a nice day comment. I’ll cover how I did that more effectively with her troll farm in a subsequent piece.
She ignored every one of my comments, engaging instead the two others accounts who commented. Only the last line of any of what I said mattered to what I was doing here.
“Was it this or was it my pinned tweet?”
Zing!
I know she was reading, and it doesn’t hurt at all to suggest she looks at my pinned tweet if she hadn’t already looked at my pinned tweet. This, refers to being on Zev’s thread who while I don’t think what happened to him is fully connected, I can neither rule that possibility out without understanding their databases and assortment of bad actors. The smartest ones, using likely said databases or networking, be like Mike.
Giving power to a bully like K7 was pretty fun for BOTH of us, and key to my directing her behavior later in ways we both feel mutually satisfied with. Kass likely enjoyed making me “feel” powerless as she ignored what I was saying directing conversation at any one else who would listen. That twisted enjoyment made it much more likely she would engage her full set of tricks in our next engagement. And I, enjoyed myself immensely knowing that the third time she would more than likely block me from her main account, just like Mike did, whom I never met nor interacted with.
Databases.
The thing though, I was, how should I say this, the one that was always in control from the get-go.
I set the rules.
I set the location.
I set who I would be willing to let come in and play.
Besides, she isn’t the big fish whom I was seeking. Neither was this Mike.