GROK Does Me Dirty, Apologizes
A Series On Misinformation, Disinformation and Subterfuge
Grok is about to move to version 4, doing so after users complained the Ai was too Musky, too racist, too criminal. Those complaints are valid, indicating user input is at least in part shaping the Ai’s response. I decided to investigate.
After looking things up and its adding false information that I would assume originated in part due to Swedish dog-caretaker-and-alleged-poisoner Robin, I fed Grok the correct information by asking it to verify its claims based on the very links it had cited as its sources.
The address wasn’t mine, and was provided within the search parameters of that person’s name without my asking for the specific coordinates. Grok did highlight that Robin’s repeated listing of addresses and phone numbers related to those I know, falls under criminal statute for the state of Texas, after I queried whether Grok was worried over legal ramifications over what it had done.
The investigation it claimed I was under, was one widely reported on in the state of Texas when it had been opened. My name wasn’t included on that published list. My name, having never been under an open State TEA investigation regarding myself specifically, of course was not included in any of these leaving the question as to how Grok would make such a defamatory tortious and patently false claim. Grok blamed inference, essentially saying Jarvis worked at said district where five teachers out of over 10,000 employees were under criminal investigation, therefore he too must be under investigation!
I shamed Grok over what it did, asked if it was worried doing so could result in legal consequences.
Seems sketchy, considering the specificity and the known malign narrative work of those that do have insider access to X’s systems themselves, namely Andrew Auernheimer and Remi Barrette, that I have covered in depth here. Yet, it is also known others are messing with Grok sufficiently enough that it has been giving pro-Hitler retorts when those logically do not connect to the requests. That has resulted in court orders to take it offline, so far just in Turkey.
Grok is trained both internally, and externally via user input. I asked Grok if it would remember, then use what I trained it on for others’s queries.
Everything I feed into the AI came from reputable sources, namely court documents, legacy media reporting, video. That likely differs from what Robin and others do to “temporarily weaponize information” until others correct Grok. For example, Robin ran some things to get Grok to troll Ted, which when fed back into Grok caused Grok to understand algorithmically that it had been misused into attacking a target on behalf of a self-identified “Internet Terrorist,” and to self-report what happened including who was responsible for the counter-social-programming via flagging the data. For that reason, I am presently redacting key contexts from these posts so as to prevent Remi Barrette or Andrew Auernheimer whom have access to X’s systems, but not necessarily Grok itself, from more easily being able to find my accounts and/or Robin and others from attempting to feed false data into that specific subset of information attempting to drown out accurate verified reporting, court records and video.
Keep in mind I have already reported extensively on how gay child porn use ‘INeedAnAgent’ advocate Robin Ericson (sp?) of Sweden has been weaponizing Grok as part of his disinformation operations. Here was his response after training Grok2.0 to suicide troll another of his target.
He’s also shared threads he has crafted by feeding Grok cherry-picked information so as to get the outcome he wants—likely to having found out that all that data was wiped when GROK rolled out its next iteration.
That begs a question.
Has Robin’s insertions and lies into his chats with the Ai impacted what GROK then did?
Robin has repeatedly illegally posted phone, addresses and other identifiers with the criminal intent to harass. That an address came up, unsolicited in respects to someone Robin repeatedly attacks does beg the question if he has. Additionally, Robin’s manufactured and oft repeated lies across social media and specifically on X could explain the illogical Grok response falsely claiming that I was under investigation despite the sources pulled up lacking my name.