Fake Parenting with Susan Portnoy, AKA KassandraSeven
A Series On Misinformation, Disinformation and Subterfuge
Susan Portnoy, a trained PsyOp flailing around with other Single Purpose Hate Account operators never had children, has attacked my own child with a sexual meme with her cult, so naturally her parenting skills are non-existent.
Currently she has pivoted her infiltration sketch targeting the anti-homeschooler movement. Here was something I laughed at, that Sue said to appear to be relatable as a 57 year old childless, never been married spinster paid to traumatize people on both sides of the political spectrum.
Susan spends all day starting in the wee hours plying her psychopath trade on Twitter with such laser focus she doesn’t have time to explain herself to a non-existent child based off of a stolen picture she tried to pass off as her “family.”
If Susan’s pretend child is a pre-schooler, which she sure makes it sound like “she” is, then Portnoy’s behavior towards her child is developmentally appropriate. One keeps things basic and literal for a preschooler. Still, I find that age is sometimes able to go beyond simple explanations and ask deeper questions. The point is to help stimulate independence and cognitive development not to restrain it by telling them all the answers all the time.
If the child is school aged, meaning five or more, this backwards mindset of Susan’s that she needs to explain everything so the kid doesn't get confused, should be replaced with inquiry. Ask questions. Let the kid in their own words predict or explain what they think. Once they are around eight or nine, their brains begin to mature, being more able to think inferentially. If one does what Sue says she is doing with her pretend daughter, her child isn’t developing higher cognitive skills.
Here is a separate example.
If the child is instead like five and is constantly asking mundane or nonsense questions specifically to a parent, that is a sign they likely crave parental attention.
In Nicole’s case, her 5 year old isn’t “fucking” with her.
But Susan is.
Portnoy, not having a clue as to how children act or think blames the child. She is literally saying that this five year old is intentionally screwing with his or her mom to get a rise out of her.
“It’s going to become a bit.”
Sue, a childless spiteful angry woman, additionally sides with the mom, noting how frustrated Nicole is by her child trying to connect with his or her distant mother.
That shows just how ridiculous Susan Portnoy’s con of being a former social worker is instead of her being a former VP of Communication at Condé Nast capable of hooking up QAnon associates with NYPost bylines on Presidential fashion.
Think about it. This child’s mom kicked their dad to the curb (or visa versa), took in an abusive man with a deep 8Chan history where child porn, misogyny, racism and abuse ran rampant. This was happening while Nicole was working herself to end the police, undermine Local, State and Federal government, being pro-prostitution, attacking the press and messing with elections. Her kid still loves her, wants her attention, and has used the only way that his delinquent mother responds too. Asking questions.
Here is my suggestion to Nicole.
Ignore what silly Sue said.
Do an experiment with the bananas and let your child learn first hand why we don’t put them in the fridge. Talk to your kids. Ask him or her while it is just the two of you why she or he is asking all these questions. Five year olds are bluntly honest and will tell you why they are feeling hurt or neglected.
Susan again seen attacking random people, this time a tiny less than 100 follower account who unlike Sue who fortunately isn’t around any kids to need parenting classes, raised real kids.
This last part is cray-cray.
Brad Shuttleworth, Fish and a not-random Donovan type sock reveals Brad revealing more than he reasonable should stating he likes them unhinged.
That also explains Brad’s strong relationships to both Susan Portnoy and Louise Mensch in a nutshell.