This:
What evidence could Flynn present to disprove any of Jim’s factual statements??
The facts submitted proving Mike Flynn was a traitor, plotted the insurrection, is running Q, are evidenced in Federal documents, Flynn’s recorded public statements, and news reports. Those statements are now adjudicated, meaning based on factual evidence are believed to be true, the reason I have called the lawsuit Flynn’s folly.
Let’s review how bad this is for Brad’s favorite felon.
Mike’s lawyer failed to claim specific damages caused by Jim Stewartson’s actions during the initial filing. Instead they cited Flynn’s biggest defenders, Mike Rothschild and Jared Holt’s article weaponizing the ADL seen below adding the false and self-exposing defamatory statement, “The ADL Center on Extremism has found no evidence to support this claim.”
Mike Flynn runs QAnon.
That’s now a legally established fact based on judicial review of presented evidence. More importantly, Mike Flynn can no longer argue that his running QAnon isn’t true, not just to Rick Wilson whom Flynn will have to pay legal fees to soon, but to Jim Stewartson who proved far more than what Rick needed to.
This ruling above was issued in regards to Rick Wilson’s single retweet of one post by Jim Stewartson.
Flynn had the opportunity to respond to Jim Stewartson’s evidence as well, which mostly consists of Mike on video saying and doing the very things that Jim Stewartson said he said and did. The courts struck ten of fourteen claims made as proven asking for more evidence on the remaining four.
Jim has the documentation to strike all remaining items from the list before the real fun begins.
Let’s look at skinny legs Fish.
Fact:
A Sarasota, Florida Court has ruled that Jim has proven that Flynn participated in the planning and implementation of the January 6th insurrection.
While the legal damage to Flynn is currently limited to just this ill-advised lawsuit, that ruling will likely be cited extensively in other legal filings post Trump prosecution.