Sarah,
You have my email, yet continue to publicly harass and conflate unrelated things with my pursuit of Mensch and her cronies with your Civil case with Louise requiring me to issue yet another statement to correct your false assertions.
The key risk to your case occurs when Louise’s legal team requests the data for the accounts Will destroyed. If he is not a witness or named party, Louise can only go after the account you created and legally own that you gave access to Welna as your conservator. If you preserved all of that account’s data and it doesn’t prove Louise’s counterclaim, things move forward.
If Welna is your witness, Louise’s team will request his social media data under her stated allegations that I am not going to repeat here. If that data is not produced, Mensch’s lawyers will move for a dismissal along with having you pay for her legal expenses. Consult your lawyer, assuming you have retained one for the final two phases.
As I have stated before, my consulting work has generally led to settlements, none of them registering on the public record. That makes me reasonably knowledgable as a sounding board for what ifs, defense or offense, maneuvering on behalf of those that ask or I choose to volunteer to help.
And no, I will not be your witness, and certainly not one for Louise Mensch who I am pursuing over non-Civil allegations like defrauding the United States with her work conspiring with Remi Barrette, AKA Conspirator0 on the Alfa Bank Trump Tower hoax. So let’s be serious now.
Here is a recent example of my working on damage control, possibly preventing DeSantis’s AG from being able to order the arrest of Rebekah Jones on a separate manipulative vengeance false flag scheme than the one his team is involved in this past week.
And for your second claim, an overstatement at best.
Louise Mensch did not delete Patribotics to personally destroy evidence. The account is in banned mode with her able to access that data. She did however rotate handles on her various sock accounts at least one time last year that I documented on a previous article. That could be construed as having tampered with evidence as that breaks links to historic tweet history without destroying the entire account..
Twitter banned Patribotics along with Dear_Mr_Putin if I recall correctly during the first half of November, over mass reported tweets containing her criminal harassment of you. Here is what happened.
When Elon Musk turned off moderation and fired its staff, the company switched to a very restrictive automated AI that required at least two key words in a report, reports of multiple tweets that met the criteria, and reports by multiple users.
Mensch’s accounts were so egregiously abusive that when Zanting wrote his Call to Digital War, despite Mensch’s accounts not being among the ones he listed originally, they were successfully knocked offline. If I recall correctly, he may have briefly “took credit” listing them among the banned, just as he did when Kathy Griffin had been, but that was after the fact and more or less his own self-promotional troll.
Zanting himself had nothing directly to do with Mensch losing her accounts, only that he posted what turned out to be a short-lived workable exploit that worked until Twitter recoded the actionable dates that could trigger such an automated action. By mid November the algorithm was adjusted and resulted in account restriction instead of suspension, even in the rare cases the algorithm triggers a strike.
My hunch is that people who dislike Mensch and also took offense to Zanting’s Call, used his suggested mass reporting tactics to offline Louise then blame Zanting. They did after all use that list to create the false flag Chad Loder wanted of the 5000 leftist Twitter account hit list Mike Rothschild and other networked frauds promoted to help set a false narrative that his ban was the result of a group called Zanting and not related to the Ryushi hack and dump Conspirator is clearly responsible for perpetuating on behalf of both aligned cooperating groups that your witnesses are entangled with.
The reason Dear_Mr_Putin, or at least the present iteration of it, exists active online is that she wanted that account restored. Louise Mensch had Remi Barrette, AKA Conspirator0, commit several felonies to hack into Twitter’s server and unban it as he has for Doug Matthew Stewart’s microchip knock-off, Chad Loder during the Ryushi hack op, and Nicole_Cares_ last week after Ella Irwin banned the account.
Again, her conspiring allegedly to hack into Twitter to restore her account involves multiple chargeable felonies, each with a maximum five year sentence. There is no criminal risk to Louise with your Civil case so knock it off with the conflations and bothering me shouting out my name.
I'm wondering how Welna is being "stalked and harassed". He claims he hasn't been on Twitter for 6 months (though I doubt that's true) so where is this alledged harassment taking place? How is he being stalked?
Mentioning someone's name in a Substack article is not stalking.